Analytical Method Development and Validation of Vadadustat in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms by Using RP-HPLC
Shaleena Munwar1*, Appala Anjali2, PSS Prasanna Kumar2, B Prem Kumar2
1Mahathi College of Pharmacy, Madanapalli, Jntua, Andhra Pradesh- 517319, India.
2A.K.R.G College of Pharmacy, Nallajerla, Jntuk, Andhra Pradesh -534112, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: pharmacy.shaleena@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
A simple, rapid, precise, sensitive and reproducible reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method has been developed for the quantitative analysis of Vadadustat in pharmaceutical dosage form. Chromatographic separation of Vadadustat was achieved on Waters Alliance-e2695, by using Inertsil ODS, 150x4.6mm, 3.5µ column and the mobile phase containing Acetonitrile and 0.1% Formic acid in the ratio of 20:80% v/v. The flow rate was 1.0 ml/min; detection was carried out by absorption at 234nm using a photodiode array detector at ambient temperature. The number of theoretical plates and tailing factor for Vadadustat were NLT 2000 and should not more than 2 respectively. % Relative standard deviation of peak areas of all measurements always less than 2.0. The proposed method was validated according to ICH guidelines. The method was found to be simple, economical, suitable, precise, accurate and robust method for quantitative analysis of Vadadustat.
KEYWORDS: HPLC Vadadustat, Inertsil ODS
INTRODUCTION:1,2,3
Vadadustat is used to treat anemia caused by chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients who have been on dialysis for at least 3 months. This medicine works by increasing erythropoietin (protein) to help the body make more red blood cells. It is also used to lessen or avoid the need for blood transfusion.
Category:
Vadadustat is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HIF PH) inhibitor.
It's a class of drugs that stabilize HIF and stimulates the production of red blood cells and erythropoietin.
Structure:
Figure 1: Structure of Vadadustat
IUPAC Name:
2-[[5-(3-chlorophenyl)-3-hydroxypyridine-2-carbonyl]amino]acetic acid
Chemical formula: C14H11ClN2O4
Molecular weight: 306.70 g·mol−1
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Table: 1: Instruments used
|
Name |
Model |
Manufacturer |
|
HPLC |
Alliance |
Waters |
|
pH meter |
pH700 |
Eutech |
|
Weighing balance |
BSA224S-CW |
Sartouris |
|
UV/VIS spectrophotometer |
UV-1700 |
Shimadzu |
|
Pipettes, beakers and Burettes |
Class-A |
Borosil |
|
Ultra sonicator |
UCA 701 |
Unichrome |
|
Pump |
Isocratic model |
Waters |
Table 2: Reagents used
|
Name |
Grade |
Manufacturer |
|
Acetonitrile |
HPLC Grade |
Merck |
|
Water (Milli Q) |
HPLC Grade |
In house production |
|
Formic acid |
AR Grade |
Merck |
Table 3: Optimized chromatographic conditions
|
PARAMETERS |
OBSERVATION |
|
Instrument used |
Waters Alliance e-2695 HPLC |
|
Injection volume |
10µl |
|
Mobile Phase |
Acetonitrile and 0.1% Formic acid (20:80) |
|
Column |
Inertsil ODS, (150x4.6mm, 3.5µ) |
|
Detection Wave Length |
234 nm |
|
Flow Rate |
1 mL/min |
|
Runtime |
5 min |
|
Temperature |
Ambient (25° C) |
|
Mode of separation |
Isocratic mode |
Mobile Phase:5
Mobile phase was prepared by mixing 0.1% Formic acid and Acetonitrile taken in the ratio 80:20. It was filtered through 0.45μ membrane filter to remove the impurities which may interfere in the final chromatogram.
Preparation of 0.1% Formic acid Buffer:6,7,8
1ml of Formic acid is dissolved in 1litre of HPLC grade water. Filter through 0.45µ nylon filter.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
System suitability:
All the system suitability parameters were within the range and satisfactory as per ICH guidelines5
Table 4: System suitability parameters for Vadadustat
|
S. No. |
Parameter |
Vadadustat |
|
1 |
Retention time |
2.855 |
|
2 |
Plate count |
8053 |
|
3 |
Tailing factor |
1.17 |
|
4 |
%RSD |
0.19 |
Analytical Method Validation (HPLC):4-10
The method was validated for its linearity range, accuracy, precision, and specificity. Method validation was carried out as per ICH guidelines.
Specificity:
Figure 2: Chromatogram of blank
Figure 3: Chromatogram of placebo
Figure 4: Optimized chromatogram
Discussion: Retention times of Vadadustat were 2.855 min. We did not find and interfering peaks in blank and placebo at retention times of these drugs in this method. So, this method was said to be specific.
PRECISION:
System Precision:
Table 5: System precision data of Vadadustat
|
S. No. |
Concentration Vadadustat (µg/ml) |
Area of Vadadustat |
|
1. |
150 |
3461273 |
|
2. |
150 |
3449174 |
|
3. |
150 |
3465906 |
|
4. |
150 |
3455689 |
|
5. |
150 |
3463622 |
|
6. |
150 |
3466453 |
|
Mean |
3460353 |
|
|
S.D |
6727.580 |
|
|
%RSD |
0.19 |
|
Discussion: From a single volumetric flask of working standard solution six injections were given and the obtained areas were mentioned above. Average area, standard deviation and % RSD were calculated for the drug. % RSD obtained as 0.19 for Vadadustat. As the limit of Precision was less than “2” the system precision was passed in this method.
Linearity:
Table 6: Results of linearity for Vadadustat
|
S. No. |
Vadadustat |
|
|
Conc.(µg/ml) |
Peak area |
|
|
37.50 |
892684 |
|
|
2 |
75.00 |
1769102 |
|
3 |
112.50 |
2704947 |
|
4 |
150.00 |
3458539 |
|
5 |
187.50 |
4234065 |
|
6 |
225.00 |
5124103 |
|
Regression equation |
y=22163.82x+53579.86 |
|
|
Slope |
22163.82 |
|
|
Intercept |
53579.86 |
|
|
R2 |
0.99953 |
|
Figure 5: Calibration curve for Vadadustat
Accuracy:
Table 7: Accuracy results of Vadadustat by HPLC method
|
% Concentration (at specification Level) |
Area |
Amount Added (mg) |
Amount Found (mg) |
% Recovery |
Mean %Recovery |
|
1716487 |
7.5 |
7.44 |
99.2 |
99.9 |
|
|
1724096 |
7.5 |
7.47 |
99.6 |
||
|
1743432 |
7.5 |
7.56 |
100.8 |
||
|
100% |
3465234 |
15.0 |
15.02 |
100.1 |
99.6 |
|
3430265 |
15.0 |
14.87 |
99.1 |
||
|
3448796 |
15.0 |
14.95 |
99.7 |
||
|
150% |
5172130 |
22.5 |
22.42 |
99.6 |
99.7 |
|
5198521 |
22.5 |
22.53 |
100.1 |
||
|
5148103 |
22.5 |
22.32 |
99.2 |
Discussion: Three levels of Accuracy samples were prepared by standard addition method. Triplicate injections were given for each level of accuracy and mean % Recovery was obtained as 99.7% for Vadadustat.
LOD and LOQ (µg/ml):
LOD and LOQ were determined by using the formula based on the standard deviation of the response and the slope. LOD and LOQ were calculated by using equations, LOD = 3.3 × σ / s and LOQ=10×σ/S., The results were presented in Table 10.
Where
σ = Standard deviation of the response
S = Slope of the calibration curve
Table 8: Data table of LOD and LOQ
|
Name of drug |
LOD (µg/ml) |
S/N |
LOQ (µg/ml) |
S/N |
|
Vadadustat |
0.45 |
3 |
1.50 |
10 |
CONCLUSION:
The developed HPLC method for the estimation of selected drug is simple, rapid, accurate, precise, robust and economical. The mobile phase and solvents are simple to prepare and economical, reliable, sensitive and less time consuming.
The sample recoveries were in good agreement with their respective label claims and they suggested noninterference of formulation excipients in the estimation and can be used in laboratories for the routine analysis of selected drugs.
Since the system validation parameters of HPLC method used for estimation of selected drug in pure and have shown satisfactory, accurate and reproducible results (without any interference of excipients) as well, it is deduced that the simple and short proposed methods be most useful for analysis purpose.
The present work concluded that stability indicating assay method by RP-HPLC was simple, accurate, precise, and specific and has no interference with the placebo and degradation products. Hence these can be used for routine analysis of Vadadustat.
REFERENCES:
1. Pergola PE, Spinowitz BS, Hartman CS, Maroni BJ, Haase VH. Vadadustat, a novel oral HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, provides effective anemia treatment in nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2016; 90(5): 1115–1122.
2. Martin ER, Smith MT, Maroni BJ, Zuraw QC, deGoma EM. Clinical trial of vadadustat in patients with anemia secondary to CKD. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(17): 1601–1612.
3. Choi D, Park S, Lee J, Kim M, Park H, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of vadadustat in healthy subjects. Clin Transl Sci. 2019; 12(4): 370–376.
4. Blessy M, Patel RD, Prajapati PN, Agrawal YK. Development of forced degradation and stability indicating methods—A critical review. J Pharm Anal. 2014; 4(3): 159–165.
5. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q2(R1): Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology. Geneva: ICH; 2005.
6. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
7. Dong MW. Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; 2006.
8. Meyer VR. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. 5th ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2010.
9. USFDA. Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry. U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2018.
10. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Guideline on Bioanalytical Method Validation. EMA, 2011.
|
Received on 04.08.2025 Revised on 08.12.2025 Accepted on 04.03.2026 Published on 16.04.2026 Available online from April 18, 2026 Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2026; 16(2):119-122. DOI: 10.52711/2231-5675.2026.00018 ©Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License. |
|